|
| This is your original post:
Finds the irony in the fact.
So the same person who ran around telling all his cult that the Ukrainians needed to give up parts of their country to stop all the killing that the invasion by Russia brought to the world, now thinks the USA should if needed use military force to take over Greenland and Panama.
I guess killing is only bad when it does not serve your master.
This is how I responded:
This is an honest question because I have no idea what he actually meant by military force. From what little I heard about it so far it sounds like Greenland is part of Denmark but Greenland is more or less self governed and seeks to eventually be independent from Denmark.
Does Trump intend to use military force to defend Greenland from Denmark? Basically that would almost certainly be a no shots fired type of situation where a show of power is all that is required to facilitate Greenlands independence.
Doing that will come at a price and I’m sure Trump will want something in return, be it Greenland becoming part of the U.S. instead of Denmark or maybe agreements for access to Greenlands vast natural resources. I read that Greenland is rich in resources including uranium.
Has Trump specifically said what he means by using military force? He was never the war monger during his previous term like so many claimed he would be and I don’t see him being one this time either. I definitely don’t support invading Greenland but I don’t think that is what he means. Personally I expect he means that he would use a show of military force to allow Greenland to have the guts to separate from Denmark.
What are your thoughts on how he intends to use military force?
You started it off with the spin of being a cult, while accusing others of spinning things. You never addressed the fact that you don’t know if he meant invading Greenland. You stated that Trump doesn’t know the history of Greenland when you actually have no idea how much he knows. I’d be very surprised if he doesn’t know a lot more about it than you.
In typical fashion for you the majority of your responses is telling other people who think differently than you they are wrong and don’t know anything without admitting that you might be the one who is wrong and don’t know anything more than anyone else. If you want to get back on subject explain, in detail, how exactly what Trump meant by using military force and explain how you know that. I have no issue with you thinking differently than I do but if you are going to assume that other people are wrong it is up to you to explain how you know that.
| |
|
Canadian farmers opinion
